Joanna Prescott
Books Free book About Articles
← All articles

Talking about "rich" without making it weird

A parent and an older child walking together along a residential street, in mid-conversation, with houses of different sizes visible behind them.

The question are we rich? was the easy one. You handled it years ago — a calm, short, honest answer when your kid was five. (Or so we hope. If you handled it badly, don't worry. The conversation recurs.)

The harder versions of the question come later.

Why does our neighbor have a bigger house?

Why does that family go on those trips every year and we don't?

Is being rich good?

Why does Maya's mom buy her new shoes every month?

Why do some people have so much and other people not have any?

These questions, for many parents, are the hardest money conversations of the whole arc. They have a moral dimension that are we rich? doesn't quite have. They involve specific other families. They activate every weird thing the parent feels about wealth, scarcity, judgment, and comparison.

And the kid is just asking. Honestly. With the same earnestness they once used to ask why the moon follows the car.

Here's how to handle these without moralizing, without resenting, without ducking.

The five things to remember

A few principles, before any specific scripts. These are what shapes the conversation more than the words.

1. The kid isn't asking for a verdict. They're asking for information. Treat the question as a fact-finding mission, not a values audit. Resist the urge to turn every wealth conversation into a moral instruction.

2. The other family is not the topic. Maya's family isn't who you're really talking about. Whatever you say about them will end up shaping how your kid talks about anyone with more or less money. Aim wide.

3. "Rich" is not a single thing. Different families have more money in different ways. Some have higher income, some have more savings, some have help from grandparents, some have inherited assets, some are spending more than they should. Kids assume rich is a coherent category. It isn't.

**4. Your kid is, at this age, learning what enough means.** The "rich" conversation is really a "what's enough?" conversation in disguise. Helping them articulate the second is the most useful work.

5. Your own discomfort will leak. If you have unresolved feelings about wealth — resentment, envy, guilt, anything — your kid will pick up the feelings, not just the words. Notice your own reactions. Don't pretend they aren't there.

The honest framework

When your kid asks why a specific other family has more, try a version of this:

"Different families have different amounts of money for lots of reasons. Some of those reasons are about how much someone earns at their job. Some are about whether their parents had a lot of money to start with. Some are about choices each family makes — saving more or less, spending on different things. It's not really one thing. It's a mix."

That's the honest answer. It doesn't moralize. It doesn't simplify. It doesn't pretend either family is better.

If the kid is younger or wants less detail, you can shorten it:

"Different families have different amounts of money for lots of reasons. Some earn more, some inherited it, some have different choices. It's not just one thing."

What you don't say:

  • "They work harder than we do." (Almost never true, and uncomfortable for the kid to internalize.)
  • "They're luckier than we are." (True sometimes, but breeds resentment as a frame.)
  • "They probably aren't really happy." (Bitter, and not actually proven.)
  • "That's because their job is X and ours is Y." (Reductive, and often inaccurate.)

Any of those becomes the story your kid carries forward about wealth. Better to leave the story open and accurate.

The "what's enough?" pivot

The most useful move, once the factual question is answered, is to pivot to the deeper question your kid is actually working out.

"You know what's interesting? Different families also have different ideas of what's enough. Some people need a bigger house to feel happy; some don't. Some need to go on big vacations; some don't. Our family decided what's enough for us. Other families decided different things."

That sentence does a few quiet things.

It names enough as a real, decided-on category — not a passive amount you happen to have.

It frames your family's choices as choices, not failures or limitations.

It teaches your kid that envy is about other people's "enough," not your own. The minute you know what your own enough is, the comparison gets less corrosive.

This is a deeply useful idea. Most adults never quite figure it out. They run on perpetual upward comparison, never landing on what they would actually need. The kid who hears we decided what enough is for us from age 9 onwards has a head start.

When the kid notices your discomfort

Sometimes the conversation about wealth lands on something you're sensitive about. Maybe you grew up with less. Maybe you grew up with more and have complicated feelings. Maybe you're currently in a tight stretch financially and the question hits a nerve.

Your kid will notice. They always notice.

When this happens, the most useful move is to name your reaction briefly rather than pretend it isn't there:

"That question is a little hard for me, actually. I have some feelings about money I'm still figuring out. Can we come back to it tomorrow when I've had time to think?"

This is one of the most generous things you can model. Your kid learns that adults also have unresolved feelings about money, that having feelings doesn't mean the topic is forbidden, and that thinking before answering is allowed. All three are useful adult skills.

What you don't do is fake calm and then leak the feeling sideways for the next week. Kids feel that. The fake calm is worse than the named reaction.

Wealth and character

At some point, your kid will ask the deeper version:

"Is it bad to be rich?"

This question deserves an honest answer, not a moral platitude.

The honest answer is something like:

"No. Having a lot of money isn't bad on its own. What matters is what people do with money. Some rich people are kind, generous, and use their money well. Some are not. Same with people who have less money — some are kind and generous, some aren't. The amount of money someone has doesn't tell you what kind of person they are."

This is true. It's also clear. It removes both poor = virtuous and rich = corrupt from your kid's emerging mental map, which is a real gift, because they'll meet plenty of generous wealthy people and plenty of stingy poor people in their lives. The class-and-character lines aren't where popular culture often suggests.

If you have a more nuanced view — about wealth concentration, about inheritance, about systemic differences — that's also worth saying, when your kid is old enough to hold it. Probably 11+ for most kids. The bigger-picture conversation can come once the basic frame is in place.

The longer arc

The kid who grows up with calm, honest conversations about wealth — what it is, what it isn't, what enough means, how families differ — becomes the adult who can be around people of any economic level without weird charge. They can have rich friends without resenting them. They can have poor friends without pitying them. They can talk about money plainly with their partner. They can be at a wedding at a country club or a dinner at a friend's modest apartment without their internal narrative shifting.

This is a rare, valuable quality. Most adults can't quite do it. The ones who can almost always had parents who modeled it.

The Maya's-mom question is small. The instinct underneath it is one of the most important things you'll shape this year.

Answer plainly. Don't moralize. Let the conversation be ordinary. That's the work.

Go deeper

Hard money conversations are one of the recurring threads across the catalog. If your kid is in the middle of this kind of question, any of the books will help you build the calm baseline they ride on.

See the books →